Because we have not sealed our borders, we have a larger than normal influx of immigrants the past decade. With that being said, the Latino students in the school system is putting more demands on school districts to accommodate their needs. Some teachers have tried to do a better a job to accommodate by teaching subjects aimed at their Latino students.
- Students Memorizing the Mexican National Anthem,
- Arizona Schools Teaching Seceding to Mexico,
- All the attempts by Congress to sneak through an amnesty bill and causing great divisiveness among Americans,
- and all the violence coming into America from Mexico from drug cartel — not to mention the U.S. Sting gone bad in trafficking weapons in Mexico.
Now a popular class among the students is being suspended because it had not been cleared first through proper channels. Time and again we have schools, teachers, and government trying to accommodate the huge numbers of immigrants coming into the U.S. through Mexico.
The biggest reason we have a problem with sealing the border is that the PLAN is to remove borders between nations in order to bring about One World Order and force America to become part of the Global Society.
- The Bilderberg Group’s plan is to divide the world into four quadrants plans to have Canada, the U.S., Mexico and Central America as one entity under the North American Union.
- Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP signed by President Bush in 2005) removes North American Borders and proves the Bilderberg PLAN is being enacted.
-
Criticism
In 2006, CNN anchor Lou Dobbs argued that the SPP was part of a plan to merge the United States, Canada, and Mexico into a North American Union similar to the European Union,[12]. Dobbs claimed at the time that US President Bush, who left office on January 20, 2009, was to have bypassed Congress and ultimately create a Union based on a Texas highway corridor.[13] One variation of this theory was that President Bush would declare a state of emergency to avoid leaving office, which, in fact, never came about; on January 20, 2009, his successor, Barack Obama, who had openly voiced misgivings about NAFTA, the predecessor to SPP, let alone SPP itself, took office as US President, but his anti-NAFTA views soon disappeared from his public persona.
The Council of Canadians claimed that the SPP extended the controversial “no fly list” of the USA, made Canadian water a communal resource, and forced Canada and Mexico to adopt the USA’s security policies – one of which would allow foreign military forces to neglect sovereignty in the case of a “civil emergency”. In addition, it also touched on the issue of Albertan tar sands expansion to five times its current size.[14]
-
Renewed Security and Prosperity Discussions
On February 4, 2011, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and US President Barack Obama announced a new security and prosperity initiative. In it they planned to “to pursue a perimeter approach to security”[24] ”in ways that support economic competitiveness, job creation, and prosperity”[24].
On March 13, 2011, the Canadian government announced it was beginning a five week consultation process “with all levels of government and with communities, non-governmental organizations and the private sector, as well as with our citizens”[25] on the implementation of the shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness.”[25]
With this being an election year for President, we need to make sure that this border issue and the SPP discussion is handled appropriately. The story that SPP is supposed to make trade and cooperation between nations better is a weak excuse for causing turmoil on this nation because our borders are not secure.
The Founding Fathers could not have foreseen all of the problems we face today but one thing they knew for sure is that our borders needed to be secure in order to protect the Constitution and the purity of the nation’s values. It is these values and principles that propelled America to the level of prosperity that we have enjoyed and with which we have blessed the world (in spite of some who may argue this truth).
We are at the crossroads now, which will determine if we become part of a Global Society and ruled under One World Order (of course they won’t call it that because it would be too obvious) or if we protect what the Founding Fathers established under God’s influence.
Will we agree with the elite Liberals — otherwise known as Democrat and Republican Progressives — or will we NOT follow the crowd and vote for people who will support the Constitution, Free Enterprise, and the values that the Constitution represents?
If you have NOT RESEARCHED the candidates thoroughly, then you should not vote until you have! Voting for President SHOULD NOT be a popularity contest. We should only vote for the one we think will be the best President. Voting is a responsibility that we inherited from the sacrifices our those who died to give us freedom and the right to vote. Please honor that right! Don’t vote because somebody is a specific race (as we did in the 2008 election) or by party unless you believe the party backing the candidate is corrupt!
- Tell our government representatives that we expect a secure border, that we expect our nation’s sovereignty to be protected and not force us into a global society, and that we want the American values that are the foundation of this nation to be honored and protected.
- Choose your President wisely.
- Insist that corrupted be prosecuted!
This is my opinion and my feelings about this topic. What is your opinion?
