The blinders covering the eyes of so many people need to be shed so they can see the truth! People need to pay attention to what is right in front of them. Yet, they continually deny that what they see and hear is not what the President is really doing. Neither will they accept that Obama is not who he represents himself to be because he is a fraud.

Yes, I recognize that what I just said is a fine line to walk but it needs to be said. Even now, finally those in the media are saying what I’ve been saying for a year: particularly, that Obama is doing these things on purpose to take down our country and promote his socialism agenda.  It’s about time people besides Beck and me ( and a few others) see what Obama is about.

I know people love the President and I understand why.  He is a likable person and an admirable father. What I don’t understand is why people can’t see the following about him:

• He was raised a Muslim and so he has to have strong feelings about Islam
• He favors Muslims and Muslim nations
• He even bows down to Muslim leaders when he visits Muslim nations. Never in our nation’s history has a U.S. President ever bowed to a King or Foreign leader.

 I am not saying that anything is wrong with being Muslim. Even though I do not know a Muslim, I accept that most of them are good people. What I am saying is that Obama does not appear to be who he says he is and who he represents himself to be to the American People.

If Obama had told Americans his plans for the United States of America — without it being coded in words we did not associate with his true motives — he knew the American People would never accept him or his agenda.

People need to pay closer attention to what Obama says and compare it to what he does. We, who see Obama and his administration for what they are, need to be much more convincing than we have been. We can’t do that when we are augmentative and offensive with people. I heard it said that, if we say negative things about him, people will turn off to our message. However, if we don’t tell people what we know, how else will they know the truth and the danger?  

Perhaps we need to just report the news and let people figure it out on their own? Maybe we can trust people to use their brains and see Obama for who he is if we keep reporting this information and stay neutral when it comes to criticizing. Stating the facts should be enough. I suggest we try doing this and see what happens. It means I have to turn over a new leaf as well. If I screw up, please remind me.

The Washington Times article below reports that Obama put Muslim Brotherhood in key positions of national security. These people have the power to make decisions regarding the nation’s security. DOES THAT WORRY YOU AT ALL? IT SHOULD!!

Imagine that Obama has put people in charge of security with whom we are at war, with whom killed Americans, and with whom stated that they hate America. This is NOT saying that we are at war with Muslims, it is saying that we are at war with people who hate America. The Muslim Brotherhood made it clear that they are at war with America and that they hate us.

Knowing how the Muslim Brotherhood feel about America and seeing what they have done in other countries (such as Egypt), would you call it treason to put these people into positions of national security?

It appears to me that people accept the enemy within our midst without saying a word. This should be as appalling to us as it would be to the founders of this great nation.

     Jared Law from The 9.12 Project: I completely agree with him.

Why aren’t Americans getting more upset about the Obama Regime’s treason? This isn’t just UNCONSTITUTIONAL, it’s directly undermining America’s NATIONAL SECURITY!

Sadly, most Americans simply don’t recognize the threats, they have no idea what’s going on, so they don’t know how mad they should be at this destructive regime. It’s up to us to spread the word, and to ensure they start paying attention to the REAL news, and to find voices like Glenn Beck, to help them find their own voices. And to encourage them to prepare.

All who agree with our principles & values (9.12′ers) need to be identified, recruited, and educated. This must happen SOONER rather than later. Time is growing short.

If a Republican had delegated national security to Israel, or the U.K., for example, by giving Jews veto power over national security concerns, the Marxist left here in America (Democrats) wouldn’t just go ballistic, they’d go nuclear, but only as a means to an end: regaining power. I just don’t understand why Republicans are so incredibly silent on these issues of national security. It’s just wrong that there isn’t more attention being focused on such things! And to trust the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, a TERRORIST-CONNECTED ISLAMIST ORGANIZATION, is absolutely insane.

Here’s the story from the Washington Times: ——–

 

 

GAFFNEY: Enemy inside the wire

SHARIAH FRONT GROUPS NOW OVERSEE FED’S COUNTEREXTREMISM TRAINING

By Frank J. Gaffney Jr | Monday, October 31, 2011 What would have happened if, during the Cold War, Soviet intelligence had been responsible for training Americans charged with countering communist aggression? Surely we would not have defeated the Soviet Union. Perhaps, instead, Nikita Khrushchev’s boast that his nation would dance on our graves would have been realized.

It should, therefore, be profoundly alarming that today the Obama administration is entrusting to agents of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) the responsibility for approving who and what is used in “countering violent extremism” training for our military, law enforcement and intelligence personnel.

The use of the term “countering violent extremism” (CVE) is, of course, the first clue that the enemy is inside the wire. That euphemism is the term Team Obama allows to be employed in lieu of phrases that actually describe the nature of the principal enemy we face at the moment: Muslims who engage in holy war – jihad – to compel the rest of us to submit to the totalitarian, supremacist political-military-legal doctrine they call Shariah.

“Countering violent extremism” is problematic for reasons beyond its lack of clarity about the threat. It also explicitly excludes a facet of the menace posed by Shariah that is at least as dangerous to an open, tolerant, liberal democracy as the violent sort of jihad: the stealthy insinuation of this doctrine in ways that are nonviolent or, more accurately, pre-violent.

The Muslim Brotherhood specializes in this sort of covert warfare, which it has dubbed “civilization jihad.” Its skills were honed during decades of operations under a succession of hostile Egyptian governments. Now that the Brothers have achieved – with no little help from President Obama – the overthrow of the last of these under Hosni Mubarak, their true colors are becoming evident. Ask the Coptic Christians who are being massacred by the putatively “nonviolent” MB.

Make no mistake: Stealthy civilization jihad is every bit as toxic and has precisely the same goals as the sort of holy war we have come to associate with murderous hijackers and suicide bombers of MB spinoffs like al Qaeda.

We know, for example, from evidence introduced uncontested by federal prosecutors in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation terrorism-funding trial that the Brotherhood’s mission here is “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying … Western civilization from within … by their hands [read, ours] and the hands of the believers so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” We also are on notice that the MB has a five-phased plan for achieving this mission in the United States; the first four phases are stealthy and pre-violent.

This brings us to the alarming guidelines recently promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security for training on countering violence. Under the heading “Trainers should be expert and well-regarded,” the department directs that a “prospective trainer’s resume be “check[ed] with knowledgeable community leaders.” Unfortunately, it appears that as far as the Obama administration is concerned, such “leaders” are exclusively those associated with organizations that the federal government and the Muslim Brotherhood itself have identified as MB fronts.

The department’s guidelines also direct that “training should be sensitive to constitutional values.” To that end, it requires that “federal, state and local government and law enforcement officials organizing CVE training … review the training program to ensure that:

• “It uses examples to demonstrate that terrorists and violent extremists vary in ethnicity, race, gender and religion.
• “Training should focus on behavior, not appearance or membership in particular ethnic or religious communities.
• “Training should support the protection of civil rights and civil liberties as part of national security. Don’t use training that equates religious expression, protests or other constitutionally protected activity with criminal activity.”

In other words, Muslim Brotherhood-associated persons are being afforded the opportunity to veto the use of trainers who might actually understand the nature of the danger its operatives and organizations pose to our country. And those who are allowed to train are not permitted to focus their students on the actual threat emanating from a subset of the Muslim community. Rather, they must promote the notion that there are really no indicators in belief or nationality that can help the authorities apply limited security resources in a sensibly prioritized manner.

Some try to excuse this behavior as nothing more than being “sensitive,” “tolerant” or “politically correct.” The danger is that Shariah-adherent Muslims regard such conduct as submissive and, according to their doctrine, they are obliged to redouble their efforts to, as the Koran puts it, make us “feel subdued.” That means more violence, not less.

That prospect becomes all the greater when one adds into the mix the presence of government officials who are themselves tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and its Shariah doctrine, including those in senior positions in the White House, the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Such persons are products of and greatly facilitate the Brothers’ influence operations and contribute greatly to our failure to date to recognize, let alone counteract, them.

If we would not have won the Cold War had the KGB been able to call the shots here, we surely will not prevail if we allow the Muslim Brotherhood to do the same in the struggle against today’s totalitarian ideology, Shariah – a doctrine some have dubbed “communism with a god.” Congressional oversight is urgently needed to prevent this from happening.

Make sure to share this discussion thread with everybody in your email lists of tea partiers and/or 9.12′ers, in addition to your peers who you believe will made good recruits to our movement!